FHA has required homes securing FHA-insured mortgages to meet asgarî standards since the program’s inception. The requirements are intended to ensure that properties are safe, sound and secure while protecting the financial stability of the MMI Fund.

Under current rules, FHA-approved lenders are responsible for determining whether a property meets FHA standards. When appraisals or inspections identify deficiencies that prevent a property from meeting FHA requirements, repairs generally must be completed before the loan becomes eligible for FHA insurance.

HUD said the last major overhaul of the MPR framework occurred more than 20 years ago. That update, implemented through Mortgagee Letter 2005-48, reduced the agency’s emphasis on requiring repairs for minor cosmetic issues and olağan wear and tear.

According to HUD, many FHA appraisals still result in repair conditions or additional inspection requirements. While similar property standards exist for loans backed by the government-sponsored enterprises Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, some industry stakeholders contend that FHA transactions experience higher rates of repair requirements and reinspections.

HUD said these requirements can add costs and delays that may not always provide corresponding benefits to home quality or safety. The agency also noted concerns that some sellers may be reluctant to accept offers from buyers using FHA financing, due to a perception that FHA loans are more likely to require repairs before closing.

Through the request for information, FHA is seeking feedback on whether current MPRs adequately protect borrowers and the mortgage insurance fund, which requirements may no longer be necessary, and whether additional flexibility for post-closing repairs should be considered.

The agency is also requesting input on whether FHA’s appraisal process and appraisers’ role in identifying property deficiencies remain consistent with çağdaş appraisal practices, as well as ways to simplify and clarify the requirements for lenders, appraisers and borrowers.

HUD’s RFI follows a letter sent last month from industry trade groups — including the Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA), Broker Action Coalition (BAC) and Community Home Lenders of America (CHLA) — to HUD Secretary Scott Turner that urged the FHA to address MPRs and other appraisal reforms.

“MBA has long urged FHA to modernize its MPRs and better align its standards with the property condition rating frameworks used by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (the GSEs),” a spokesperson told HousingWire. “This would reduce operational friction while maintaining appropriate safety and soundness protections.”

“We believe alignment between FHA and GSE property standards could help reduce appraisal-related delays, improve consistency across the market, and expand access to qualified appraisers. We will meet with our members to formulate our response by the June 29 deadline.”

Steve Irwin, president of the National Reverse Mortgage Lenders Association (NRMLA), also issued a statement about the RFI.

“NRMLA and its membership appreciate HUD’s publishing of the recent RFI on en az property requirements. We’ve put our committee structure in motion to begin drafting NRMLA’s response. There is always an opportunity to revisit rules and regulations and modernize that guidance to current realities and technology advances,” Irwin said.

Coby Hakalir, vice president of mortgage banking and core services for consultancy firm T3 Sixty, issued a statement in which he called FHA “its own worst enemy” in this situation.

“Fannie and Freddie insure plenty of safe homes without flagging chipped paint surfaces or missing handrails for a mandatory repair-and-reinspects. FHA’s far higher repair rates aren’t buying borrowers meaningfully safer houses. What they’re buying is a reputation that makes sellers reject FHA offers,” Hakalir said.

“When a first-time buyer using the program designed for them gets passed over for a conventional offer, the property standard moved from protecting that buyer to locking them out. Modernizing MPRs to match the GSEs’ risk-based approach is long overdue, and HUD should be aggressive about it.”